casino payouts best online casino payouts best slots for real money play slot machines for real money online casino american players american online casinos best online blackjack best online blackjack online gambling promotions online casino promotion trusted online casino reputable online casinos
Technical Education Webinar Series
Title: High Frequency Materials and Characterization up to Millimeter Wave Frequencies
Date: October 23, 2014
Time: 8am PT/ 11am ET/ 3pm UTC
Sponsored by: Rogers Corp.
Presented by: John Coonrod, Sr. Market Development Engineer, Rogers Corporation, Advanced Circuit Materials Division
Screen shot 2014-10-17 at 12.58.15 PMOverview:
Microwave circuit designers have many powerful tools. However most are strongly dependent on the accuracy of the input data. High frequency printed circuit board (PCB) material properties are often assumed to be very simple, but understanding the details can increase model accuracy and minimize design time.
Those familiar with high frequency behavior of circuit materials realize the term for relative permittivity of “dielectric constant” is a misnomer and is not a constant. The dielectric constant of any PCB material will vary with frequency. Additionally wave propagation properties can be altered by a relationship of substrate thickness to copper surface roughness and this can vary the dielectric constant as perceived by circuit performance, even when using homogenous material.This webinar will give a simple overview of common test methods used to determine the dielectric constant for high frequency materials, followed by a description of methods that are best for characterizing material properties for microwave modeling and design.Agenda:

  • Description of Common Test Methods
  • Optimal Test Procedures for Circuit Characterization
  • Real World Application of RF Circuit Design Best Practices

Why join this webcast?
The actual circuit defined dielectric constant is an elusive property for designers to properly incorporate into their design models. This webinar will help designers define the dielectric constant parameters of a circuit as related to frequency, circuit thickness and copper surface roughness.

Register Now

Sponsored by:

Rogers Corporation

 

 

The Rogers Corporation Board of Directors has appointed Helene Simonet to serve as a member of the Company’s Board. This addition fills a vacancy on the Board due to a recent director retirement.  Ms. Simonet will be a member of the Audit Committee.

RogersCorporation logoSince April 2002, Ms. Simonet has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Coherent, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHR). Coherent is a leading global supplier of photonics technology products and solutions for a wide range of commercial and scientific research applications. Prior to joining Coherent in 1999, Ms. Simonet had previously spent more than twenty years in senior finance positions at Raychem Corporation.

“We are very pleased to have Helene join the Rogers Board of Directors,” said Bruce Hoechner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Rogers Corporation. “Her extensive background with global technology companies, as well as her finance leadership, makes her an excellent addition to our Board.”

Find more Rogers Corp. news here.

 

 

This post authored by John Coonrod originally appeared on the ROG Blog hosted by Microwave Journal.

High frequency signals must survive many transitions in an RF/microwave system, with one of the more challenging being the point at which signals are “launched” from a coaxial connector to a printed-circuit board (PCB). Managing that transition without interruptions to the signals requires not only proper mechanical alignment but careful electrical optimization. Signals can propagate through many different kinds of coaxial connectors and many types of PCB materials, and the combinations require proper preparation to form the most seamless transitions. Following some general guidelines can help improve the effectiveness of an RF/microwave signal launch in double-copper-layer and multilayer PCBs, even when they contain different types of transmission-line formats, such as microstrip, stripline, and coplanar-waveguide (CPW) transmission lines.

PrintSuccessful high-frequency signal launches require a tight match between a coaxial connector and a PCB. Because of the wide number of choices for each, there are no automatic combinations that ensure this tight match. But following some basic design guidelines and, hopefully, access to computer simulation software, such as a commercial three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic (EM) simulator, can help in optimizing the signal launch from a coaxial connector to a PCB.

In general, signal launches require good impedance matches between a coaxial connector and a PCB’s transmission lines. Good signal launches are easier to achieve at lower frequencies, and generally easier to achieve for narrowband designs than for broadband designs.

Many different coaxial connector types are used at high frequencies, including BNC, Type N, and SMA connectors, each with its own frequency range and mechanical and electrical characteristics. Connectors are differentiated by gender (male or female) as well as by different styles, such as standard straight connectors, edge-launch connectors for PCBs, and right-angle connectors for PCBs. These connectors and, often, their connected coaxial cables, will have a characteristic impedance, such as 50 or 75 Ω. A key to achieving a good signal launch to a PCB is to minimize disruptions in the impedance from the connector’s center conductor to the metal transmission line on the PCB, so that high-frequency signals can launch or flow without insertion loss or reflections (return loss) from the connector to the PCB’s transmission lines.

Signals and their electromagnetic (EM) fields propagating through a cable and connector have a cylindrical orientation, compared to the signals and EM fields in a PCB which have a planar or rectangular orientation. In changing from a connector to a PCB, the signals change orientation to adapt to the new propagation medium, and anomalies can occur in the form of signal loss or reflections. Different types of transmission lines on the PCB can present different challenges in making the connector-to-PCB transition, with grounded-coplanar-waveguide (GCPW) transmission lines providing the easiest transition, followed by microstrip transmission lines, and then stripline transmission lines being the most difficult to make the transition because of their “buried-within-the-substrate” nature.

Circuit designers have learned a few tricks in launching signals from different connectors to different types of transmission lines and PCBs. For one thing, the ground path on a PCB is a very important part of any successful signal launch from a connector to a PCB, since a continuous ground return path is essential to the uninterrupted, low-loss propagation of high-frequency signals from a connector through the PCB. The length of the ground path can also affect the quality of a signal launch from a coaxial connector to a PCB. Even such things as minimizing differences in conductivity between the solder used to join a coaxial connector’s metal parts to a PCB’s conductor metal can make an impact in improving the transition and the performance, especially at higher frequencies. These small losses and impedance mismatches are increasingly noticeable at higher frequencies.

One of the most basic practices in achieving a good signal launch is to minimize dimensional differences between a connector’s conductor and the circuit’s conductor on the PCB to which it is connected. At higher frequencies, connector dimensions shrink, and there is more of a tendency for the PCB’s conductor to be much wider, resulting in a capacitive spike at the transition from the connector conductor to the PCB conductor. Circuit designers have learned that by tapering the circuit conductor to create a more narrow transition where it meets the coaxial connector’s conductive pin, the transition becomes more inductive and less capacitive in nature, and the capacitive spike at the transition can be reduced or minimized. Impedance mismatches in the signal launch interface between a connector and a PCB are due to changes in the electrical characteristics of the circuit. An increase in impedance is due to a rise in inductance at the transition while a decrease in impedance is the result of an increase in capacitance at the transition.

Modifying the inductive or capacitive nature of the transition from the coaxial connector to the PCB will result in frequency-dependent changes to the nature of the signal launch. The PCB’s ground-plane spacing can also play a role in these frequency-dependent changes depending on how it changes the inductive/capacitive characteristics of the PCB and the transition. The length of the taper used to narrow the PCB’s transmission lines closer to the dimensions of the coaxial connector’s conductor can also impact the frequency response of the circuit

How does the choice of PCB material impact the quest for a high-performance signal launch? One of the more important characteristics of any circuit material for achieving a good signal launch is consistent dielectric constant (Dk) value throughout the material. Not only will this ensure consistent impedance for the transmission lines on the PCB but it will aid in achieving the desired impedance match at the transition from the coaxial connector to the PCB. The choice of circuit material Dk value will impact circuit dimensions at a given frequency, with higher Dk values resulting in narrow conductor widths and smaller circuits for a given frequency compared to circuit materials with lower Dk values. The thickness of the PCB material will also affect the transition from connector to PCB, since thicker PCB materials will yield wider transmission-line conductor widths for the same impedance, which may require additional tapering on the PCB in order to achieve a conductor width that is more closely matched to the coaxial connector’s conductor width.

Multilayer circuits (with layers usually numbered according to the number of conductor layers) can produce their own set of headaches for achieving good signal launches with coaxial connectors, since they offer added complexity and may even include different transmission-line technologies together. Coaxial connectors are typically mounted on the top of a multilayer assembly, and plated through holes (PTHs) are used to create electrical paths to the different PCB conductor layers. A connector’s signal launch typical employs a PTH for electrical connections to the PCB’s inner conductor layers. Access to inner layer conductors may be more difficult, but the essential guidelines referenced for achieving good signal launch, such as trying to match connector and PCB conductor dimensions, still hold.

Download the ROG Mobile app to access Rogers’ calculators, including the popular Microwave Impedance simulation tool, literature, technical papers, and the ability to order samples of the company’s high performance printed circuit board materials.

Do you have a design or fabrication question? Rogers Corporation’s experts are available to help. Log in to the Rogers Technology Support Hub and “Ask an Engineer” today.

 

DSC01134-LThe High Performance Foams Division of Rogers Corporation held their Biennial Preferred Converter Conference at the Omni Barton Creek in Austin, Texas the week of September 15, 2014. The gathering consisted of Preferred Converters and Rogers’ personnel from across Europeand North America.

Everyone had a wonderful time and learned about newproducts, design tools, and shared markets in the comfort and beauty of theTexas Hill Country surrounding Austin.

Attendees raved:

DSC01206-L“Another great conference. Really enjoyed the location.”

“Wonderful event as always. Good mix of content and fun”

“This was our first event and thought the group of PC Partners was very professional and trustworthy. It was great to get to meet such a diverse group of people and learn about their companies and capabilities. The Rogers team was outstanding and knowledgeable about their products. I am looking forward to the next meeting. Job well done!”

DSC01230-L

DSC01253_modified_tc

DSC01992 resized

 

Over the years, we’ve placed PORON® XRD Extreme Impact Protection foam in some tough situations. The big question…

Will XRD® protect?

First up, will XRD® resist and protect an iPhone against a powerful rat trap? Let’s test it!

Then we brought Buster (our impact machine) out of the XRD® Impact Institute Lab to show journalists the impact protection capabilities of XRD Technology. The test: dropping a 10 lb weight from 20″.

Thank you to PROJECTS Hamburg for hosting this great event! 

To see XRD brand partners and products containing XRD Extreme Impact Protection visit:
www.poronxrd.com
www.facebook.com/poroncushioning
www.twitter.com/poroncushioning
www.youtube.com/poroncushioning

 
Page 1 of 4712345...102030...Last »